Stablecoin remittances hit 9% in Bank of Italy test
Banca d'Italia has released a July 2026 study finding that stablecoin remittances do not consistently beat traditional transfer services on cost or speed.
Summary
- Ten USDC corridors produced total remittance costs ranging from 0.30% to nearly 9%, researchers found.
- Under 20 minutes was achievable where instant payment systems supported both fiat conversion endpoints efficiently.
- Three corridors beat Wise, while four cost more, showing stablecoin savings remained highly corridor-specific overall.
Researchers executed real transfers of 200 USDC across ten corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and Japan.
The mystery-shopping study recorded total costs from 0.30% to almost 9%. The blockchain leg averaged only 0.4%, while exchange purchases, funding methods, withdrawals and foreign-exchange conversion produced most of the expense. The authors said stablecoins showed "no systematic cost advantage" over traditional channels.
Stablecoin remittance costs varied sharply by corridor
The Italy-to-Argentina transfer was the cheapest at 0.30%, while Argentina-to-Italy cost 8.96%. The study warned that the low outbound Argentina result partly reflected differences between the country's official and market exchange rates, rather than blockchain efficiency alone.
Brazil-to-Italy cost 2.21%, compared with 2.70% in the opposite direction. South Africa-to-Italy cost 5.44%, while Italy-to-South Africa reached 4.58%. The two UAE routes were among the most expensive at 7.20% and 8.95%, partly because card funding and withdrawal charges increased the total.
USDC beat Wise in only three comparable routes
Banca d'Italia compared its transactions with Wise simulations for the same $200 amount. USDC was cheaper in three routes: Italy to Argentina, Italy to South Africa and Brazil to Italy. It was more expensive in four, including both UAE routes and Italy to Brazil.
The researchers cautioned that the transfers and Wise simulations occurred on different dates. They also described the World Bank comparison as an indicative benchmark rather than a like-for-like test. The paper covers one stablecoin and a limited number of transactions, so its findings "cannot be readily generalized" to every provider or corridor.
Fast domestic payments determined transfer speed
The onchain portion took less than 15 minutes in seven of eight directly comparable corridors. However, complete settlement depended on the banking systems used to fund exchanges and withdraw local currency.
Transfers involving Italy's TIPS, Brazil's Pix and Argentina's Transferencias 3.0 finished in under 20 minutes. South African routes took one or two business days because standard bank transfers slowed the fiat endpoints. The study therefore found that stablecoin rails and domestic instant-payment systems worked as complements, not substitutes.
Japan presented a separate problem. The Japan-to-Italy transfer cost 1.6%, but regulatory limits required an unhosted wallet and fragmented transactions, making the process unsuitable for a direct timing comparison. The reverse route cost 1.3% without completing the final off-ramp.
Better on-ramps may matter more than cheaper blockchains
The findings support Banca d'Italia Governor Fabio Panetta's May assessment that stablecoins may work in selected corridors but do not provide a universal answer to expensive remittances. He argued that regulators should improve domestic payment infrastructure and connect fast-payment systems across borders.
A March 2026 BIS paper reached a related conclusion, identifying weak interoperability, fragmented standards and institutional differences as the main barriers to cheaper cross-border payments. That suggests blockchain settlement alone cannot remove compliance, banking and local-currency bottlenecks.
Industry deployments continue to test the other side of the argument. As crypto.news reported, Borderless.xyz found competitive stablecoin pricing across 260 business-payment corridors during the second quarter. In related coverage, a Hyundai trial moved $20,000 between the U.S. and Mexico in about seven minutes, while SBI Remit partnered with Fasset to develop stablecoin remittance infrastructure.
Those cases do not directly contradict the central-bank experiment. They involve different transfer sizes, business models and endpoints. The next step is broader testing across more tokens, providers, dates and transaction amounts, with full disclosure of exchange spreads, withdrawal costs and local payout times.
This content is provided for general informational purposes only and doesn't constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Any events, rewards, online promotions, or related information mentioned herein should not be considered a recommendation, solicitation, or invitation to purchase, sell, trade, or otherwise deal in any crypto assets. Crypto assets are highly volatile and may result in loss. The availability of WEEX services, products, and related events may vary by region. You are responsible for ensuring that your participation is in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations.
You may also like

Stock Market: Why Wall Street is Buying While Investors are Selling

RWA perps will outpace tokenization

Pedro Sánchez described the migration crisis in Ceuta as an "attack on Spain's territorial integrity"

Algorithms in Cryptocurrencies: How the 'Crypto Tools' Strategy from 'Finam' Works

The complete list of Chinese cars in Argentina with prices starting from $18,900

Stocks Plummet More Than Cryptos: Where Did the Money Go?

Franco Baresi, Milan legend and World Cup champion with Italy, has died

What Changes Have Occurred in the Crypto Industry by 2026?

Robinhood earns $160 target from Bernstein on tokenization and Rothera growth

Central Banks Bet More Than Ever on Gold Amid Global Uncertainties

Pressure Mounts for Land Law: A Sector of the UCR Opposes and Seeks to Convince Senators

Fintech giant KSNet joins Solana Foundation to trial Solana Pay in South Korea

Telegram: Pavel Durov Responds to Russian Accusations and Denounces Mass Surveillance

Bitcoin self-custody debate erupts over poor wallet UX

Bitcoin Under Scrutiny After Bank of Japan's Decision

Clarity Act Impact on XRP: Why Polymarket Sentiments Are Shifting in 2026

Crypto treasuries pivot to AI data center funding

The New Cold War is a War of Technology Stocks

The Corporation is Not the End: The Next Generation of Organizational Forms Emerges

Hungary Abolishes Cryptocurrency Verification Rules, Restructures Market to Comply with MiCA

Two Escapes in One Week: Is Claude from Anthropic Doing What He Wants?

BIS Tests 'Tokenized Currency' for Cross-Border Payments: 28 Global Banks Participate, Average Settlement Time of 80 Seconds

A Comprehensive Overview of Web3 Infrastructure: Understanding the Future of Blockchain Through Five Core Technologies

Japan Keeps Interest Rates at 1% as Carry Trade Remains Alive: What It Means for Bitcoin

"Backstab" or "Win-Win"? How Likely is TradeXYZ to Fly Solo from Hyperliquid?

What Building in Crypto Looks Like in 2026

Why is Axis's Arbitrage Story Attractive, Filling $50 Million in 22 Hours?

Hong Kong Opens the Door to XRP for Individual Investors, Leading Asia in Expanding Regulated Markets

Cryptocurrency Adoption Reaches Unprecedented Levels in Canada










