Successive Core Team "Heroes" Depart, Has Aave's DAO Dream Crumbled?
Original Title: "Key Contributors Successively Leaving, Has Aave's DAO Dream Been Shattered?"
Original Author: Bootly, BitpushNews
On March 3, the Aave protocol's core governance team Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) announced it would shut down operations and leave AAVE.
This is the second major contributor to leave within two weeks—previously on February 20, the development team behind the Aave V3 codebase, BGD Labs, announced their exit.

Following the announcement, the AAVE token price dropped over 11%.
As the most successful DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) in DeFi history, the flagship of DeFi with nearly $27 billion in TVL, is going through a profound internal turmoil.

From Revenue Attribution Dispute to Bundled Voting
The seeds of this crisis were sown as early as December last year.
At that time, Aave Labs, without governance discussion, switched the front-end interface's transaction aggregator from ParaSwap to CoW Swap. Fees that were supposed to go to the DAO treasury now flowed into Aave Labs' account.
Faced with criticism, Aave founder Stani Kulechov's response was: the front-end interface was built by Labs, so the revenue naturally belongs to Labs; only the smart contracts and liquidity pools belong to the DAO. This explanation may hold legally, but it sparked discontent within the community.
To quell the dispute, Aave Labs proposed a proposal called "Aave Will Win" in February this year. The proposal mainly includes: requesting DAO approval for around $51 million to be used for V4 development, in exchange for transferring all future revenue from Aave branded products to the DAO, and establishing Aave V4 as the sole technical foundation, gradually phasing out V3.
The issue is that these three matters were bundled together. Support revenue going to the DAO but think the fund size is too large? No choice. Believe V3 still holds value and should not be sidelined? Equally no choice. It's either all or nothing.
ACI's Grievance: Opaque Voting
In ACI's exit statement, the most crucial allegation is that a significant portion of the support for the proposal came from addresses associated with Aave Labs. The interim check vote only passed with a slim 52.58% majority, and ACI believes the outcome might have been different without these "self-votes."

ACI founder Marc Zeller wrote, "If a major budget recipient can abuse their undisclosed voting power to push through their proposal forcefully, then independent service providers lose their purpose in the DAO."
ACI did not fail to attempt to address the issue. Before the vote, it laid out four conditions, including stricter on-chain milestone tracking, limiting self-voting by budget recipients, etc., but none were adopted.
This conflict reflects structural issues in DAO governance.
Aave Labs holds the codebase, brand domain, social media, and development narrative power. BGD Labs maintains the flagship V3 version—it contributed over 75% of the protocol's revenue and 97% of the total deposits. ACI is responsible for governing coordination and business development, claiming to have driven 61% of governance actions in the past three years, helping increase Aave's DeFi market share from less than 50% to over 65%.
These three teams were supposed to balance each other out. However, with BGD and ACI exiting successively, the remaining power center, no matter how it postures, is hard to trust completely.
In response to ACI's exit announcement, Stani Kulechov stated, "Thank Marc for his contributions over the years; the protocol will continue to operate as normal."

But this response did not address the core issue: when the person most capable of assessing V3's technical risks has exited, how can the DAO confidently bet its future on untested V4?
Another noteworthy detail is that institutional investor Blockchain Capital later revealed that, due to the custody platform not supporting snapshot voting, their held AAVE could not participate. This reveals another reality of DAO governance: while ostensibly decided collectively by token holders, voting power often tends to concentrate in the hands of a few.
DAO Governance Dilemma
ACI indicates that during the next four months of the transition period, governance dashboards, incentive frameworks, committee roles, and other tools and responsibilities will be transferred or open-sourced. However, some things are difficult to transfer: three years of accumulated governance experience, familiarity with protocol details, and the interpersonal network for coordinating different stakeholders.
Data shows that over the past three years, ACI has spent $4.6 million DAO on helping GHO stablecoin grow from $35 million to $527 million. Who will take over this work in the future remains unknown.
The recent turmoil at Aave is essentially a microcosm of the DAO governance dilemma.
In theory, a DAO is a community of token holders. However, in practice, governance is often dominated by the founding team, early investors, and core developers. These roles are both rule-makers and enforcers, and sometimes recipients of the budget. When conflicts of interest arise, whether "procedural justice" is sufficient becomes a contentious issue.
A DeFi practitioner commented, "This is not a matter of right or wrong, but when interests and positions are at odds, the existing governance mechanisms do not provide an effective way to resolve them."
What's next?
The revision of the "Aave Will Win" proposal during the ARFC phase will be the first window to observe the situation's direction. If Kulechov's promised "structural improvements" can be implemented, such as splitting the bundled proposal, clarifying voting behavior boundaries, it may bring this turmoil to a close.
If a consensus cannot be reached, the most extreme possibility is that BGD and ACI will start afresh and fork out a new protocol. Despite the high liquidity barrier, it is not impossible—core developers and governance teams simultaneously exiting provide the technical foundation and community basis for the fork.
For Aave, the immediate issue is how to fill the void left by the departure of two core teams. The longer-term issue is how to find a more sustainable balance between the founder's vision, core developers' interests, and community will. If the paradox of "centralization of power" cannot be resolved, even the strongest protocol may lose its first-mover advantage in endless infighting.
You may also like
How to Earn Up to 40% Rebates on Crypto Futures Trading (WEEX Trade to Earn IV Guide)
WEEX Trade to Earn IV lets traders earn up to 40% fee rebates in real time through a tiered miner system tied to trading activity. With additional boosts from referrals, it offers a more reliable alternative to airdrops as the crypto market gains momentum.

NVIDIA Plays Trillion-Dollar Chess Game | Rewire News Morning Edition

Real-time Update | NVIDIA GTC 2026 Conference Highlights Galore

People Behind Pokémon Go: Started with CIA's Money, Now Mapping the World for the Military AI

Huang Renxun GTC Speech Full Text: By 2027, Market Demand Will Exceed $1 Trillion; Everyone Should Develop an OpenClaw Strategy

Stratechery Debunks the AI Bubble Myth: What Should We Do with AI?

Three Charts to Watch at NVIDIA's GTC: Cheaper Compute, Spend More

BTC Eight Green Candles Reach $76K, What Is the Logic Behind Outperforming Gold in the Midst of Battle?

Morning Report | Strategy invested $1.57 billion last week to increase its holdings by 22,337 bitcoins; Abra plans to go public through a SPAC merger; Metaplanet aims to raise approximately $765 million to increase its bitcoin holdings

CB Insights: Nine Predictions for the Fintech Sector in 2026, with Asset Tokenization Already Becoming a Trend

Huang Renxun's full GTC speech: The era of inference has arrived, with revenue expected to reach at least one trillion dollars by 2027, and lobster is the new operating system
Trade Gold, Silver & Oil on WEEX: $300K Rewards and 0% Fees
WEEX has launched a large-scale Gold, Silver, and Oil trading campaign featuring 0% fees, a $300K reward pool, and Trade-to-Earn opportunities, allowing traders to deposit, trade tokenized commodities like PAXG and XAUT, and compete on leaderboards — all at WEEX.

WEEX P2P now supports KZT, UZS, AMD, GEL & MDL—Merchant Recruitment Now Open
To make crypto deposits easier, WEEX has officially launched its P2P trading platform and continues to expand fiat support. We're excited to announce that the Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT), Uzbekistani Som (UZS), Armenian Dram (AMD), Georgian Lari (GEL) and Moldovan Leu (MDL) are now available on WEEX P2P!

21Shares Enhances Crypto ETP Pricing with FTSE Partnership
Key Takeaways: 21Shares AG updates the pricing methodology for its Bitcoin and Ethereum-linked ETPs on the London Stock…

Alibaba AI Projects Crypto Value Surge for XRP, Bitcoin, and Ethereum by 2026
Key Takeaways: Alibaba’s AI predicts significant price increases for XRP, Bitcoin, and Ethereum by 2026’s end, driven by…

Ethereum USD Reclaims $2,200 Amidst Crypto Market Surge
Key Takeaways: Ethereum USD rebounds from $1,840 lows, reclaiming the $2,200 mark with a +19% recovery as of…

TRUMP Memecoin Investors Granted Exclusive Mar-a-Lago Invite
Key Takeaways: $TRUMP memecoin holders gain exclusive access to a Mar-a-Lago event featuring Donald Trump and other key…

Why Is Crypto Up: BTC USD Decoupling From Gold Amid Heated Israel-Iran Conflict
Key Takeaways: Bitcoin’s price recently hit $74,000, marking its highest close since February 2026 before slightly retracting to…
How to Earn Up to 40% Rebates on Crypto Futures Trading (WEEX Trade to Earn IV Guide)
WEEX Trade to Earn IV lets traders earn up to 40% fee rebates in real time through a tiered miner system tied to trading activity. With additional boosts from referrals, it offers a more reliable alternative to airdrops as the crypto market gains momentum.