2025 Crypto Prediction Mega Review: What Nailed It and What Noped It?

By: blockbeats|2025/12/04 19:30:02
0
Share
copy
Original Title: "2025 Crypto Prediction Review: 10 Institutions, Who Got It Right and Who Got It Wrong?”
Original Source: DeepTech TechFlow

As we approach the end of the year, it is foreseeable that the 2026 crypto predictions and outlooks of major institutions will be released over the next month.

However, before looking at the new predictions, it might be worth reviewing what these institutions said last year; after all, making predictions is easy, but accuracy is the real skill.

Recalling the end of 2024, with the market sentiment soaring and BTC just breaking $100,000, everyone's predictions were generally optimistic:

For example, BTC would surge to $200,000, stablecoin volume would double, AI agents would trigger on-chain activities, and crypto unicorns would rush to IPO... Now, a year has passed, have those predictions from back then all come true?

We have selected several typical institutions and individuals from last year's various prediction reports for a detailed review, to see whose prediction accuracy is higher.

1. VanEck: Accuracy 10%, Only Correct Prediction was Establishing a Bitcoin Strategic Reserve

2025 Crypto Prediction Mega Review: What Nailed It and What Noped It?

At the end of 2024, VanEck made 10 predictions, with the only correct one being the establishment of a Bitcoin strategic reserve.

The other 9 were all off the mark, and most were not slight deviations but orders of magnitude errors. For example, predicting the peak of Q1 in crypto and Bitcoin reaching $180k, and hitting a new high by the end of the year; in reality, the timing and price targets were completely opposite.

Furthermore, their market size predictions were overly optimistic. They predicted tokenized securities to reach $500 billion, whereas it was around $300-350 billion in reality; DeFi TVL was predicted at $200 billion, while it was around $1200-1300 billion in reality; NFT transaction volume was forecasted at $300 billion, whereas actual estimates were $50-65 billion.

Overall, VanEck's judgment on policy direction was quite accurate, but they systematically overestimated the on-chain economic scale.

2. Bitwise: Accuracy 50%, General Direction Correct but Price Predictions Wrong

Bitwise made 10 predictions, with 5 hitting the mark, mainly focusing on regulatory and institutional adoption areas; however, their price and scale predictions also suffered from systematic overestimation.

· Policy and Institutional Adoption Hit the Mark. Coinbase and MicroStrategy entering the US stock indices became a reality; the Crypto IPO Era unfolded, with multiple crypto companies going public through IPOs; the number of countries holding BTC increased from 9 to nearly 30.

· Price Targets All Missed: Price predictions for BTC, ETH, and SOL were significantly higher than the actual performance of these tokens this year. Coinbase's stock price at $250 fell short of the $700 target by 65%. The estimated $500 billion in RWA tokenization also turned out to be an overestimation.

Overall, Bitwise demonstrated keen policy insight, accurately capturing the regulatory shift and institutional adoption momentum.

3. Coinbase: Accuracy Rate Close to 100%, Focusing on Direction Rather Than Price

Coinbase's forecasts are divided into two main categories: "Macro" and "Disruptive," mostly offering directional judgments rather than precise numbers, focusing on trend foresight.

Here are some core verifiable forecasts:

Additionally, some forecasts were directionally correct but challenging to quantify:

You can notice that this firm's forecasts clearly avoid specific price targets, concentrating on policy inflection points and industry trends. As a result, all core directional forecasts naturally hit the mark.

· Regulatory Shifts Fully Validated: Predictions regarding the "Most Crypto-Friendly Congress" bringing positive news and more asset ETF approvals; the actual situation indeed unfolded as predicted.

· Stablecoins and DeFi Overall Direction Correct: Predictions about stablecoins "experiencing explosive growth and expanding into commercial payments" came true this year, as evidenced by Mastercard's June announcement to support USDC/PYUSD/USDG, Coinbase integrating its payment platform with Shopify, and Stripe launching USDC subscription payments;

The prediction of a DeFi resurgence materialized, with DeFi TVL reaching $120 billion, nearing a three-year high since May 2022.

This "directional without pinpointing price" strategy, while lacking in sensationalism, retrospectively appears the most robust and less prone to being proven wrong.

4. Galaxy Research: Accuracy Rate 26%, Data-Related Predictions Almost All Wrong

Galaxy's various researchers made a total of 23 predictions, making it the most quantitative and comprehensive list among all institutions.

In hindsight, the policy prediction team performed excellently (100% hit rate), while price and market size predictions were almost all incorrect. In particular, the prediction of DOGE breaking $1 can now be seen as overly optimistic.

Furthermore, Galaxy's predictions on ecosystem development were fairly accurate. For example, predicting that most mining companies would transition to AI and high-performance computing was indeed a prominent trend amid this year's AI boom.

When predictions are numerous and detailed, even professional research institutions will not always get everything right; the market does not always unfold as expected.

5. Hashkey: Accuracy Rate 70%, Price Predictions Too Optimistic

Overall, HashKey's predictions were precise regarding regulatory progress (ETFs, stablecoin legislation) and ecosystem structural changes (DEX emergence, L2 differentiation), but they were overly optimistic about price cycles.

Interestingly, these predictions also reflected the sentiment of the crypto community at the time.

After HashKey Group released its top 10 market forecasts for 2025, nearly 50,000 community users participated in a vote based on the sixteen popular predictions summarized by HashKey researchers, analysts, and traders;

The results showed that 50% of voters favored the prediction of "Bitcoin breaking $300,000, Ethereum surpassing $8,000, and the total crypto market cap reaching $10 trillion."

Ironically, the prediction with the highest voting probability is now looking the least likely to materialize by the end of this year.

6. Delphi Digital: Accuracy Rate 40%, Consumer-Level DeFi Predictions Stand Out

Delphi Digital's predictions were more accurate concerning technical infrastructure and consumer-level applications; with the prediction on consumer-level applications stated as:

"2025 will be a critical development milestone for consumer-level DeFi, as more and more crypto users will fully embrace on-chain financial services."

This year, we have also seen various U-cards and tokenization of US stocks. In addition, traditional financial applications such as Robinhood are gradually embracing the blockchain.

7. Messari: Accuracy 55%, No Specific Price Points Involved

Although Messari is a data analysis platform, its predictions tend to lean towards the "trend direction" rather than "specific numbers," and in hindsight, its judgment on major trends has been relatively accurate.

8. Framework Ventures: Accuracy 25%, Providing More Confidence to Invested Projects

Next, we have selected some of the more representative personal prediction viewpoints from last year to see how the results turned out.

First is the prediction from Vance Spencer, co-founder of Framework Ventures. We have extracted the part related to crypto:

Evidently, Vance has shown high prediction expectations for projects in which he has invested, such as Glow, Daylight, and Berachain, representing the energy and public chain sectors, respectively.

In addition, some quantitative targets are overly aggressive, such as an average daily inflow of $1 billion into an ETH ETF.

9. Blockworks Co-founder: Accuracy 48%, Most Number of Predictions

Blockworks co-founder Mippo (Twitter: @MikeIppolito_) is the individual with the highest number of predictions among our review of institutions and individuals, and although the accuracy of his predictions is good, he got nearly half of them right.

A highlight is that his prediction about the rise of Robinhood was completely correct, and he also seized the investment opportunity in L1, such as Hyperliquid and SUI, both of whose tokens have had remarkable performances this year.

10. Alliance DAO Wang Qiao & Imran: Accuracy 50%, Overly Optimistic about BTC Price

Alliance DAO's two founders, Wang Qiao and Imran, have also made predictions about the development of the next 25 years during a podcast chat.

We have compiled their views related to crypto as follows:

It can be seen that the two founders' expectations for BTC were overly optimistic. Even the lowest predicted value of 150K is still a long way from this year's highest BTC price.

However, their market prediction was very accurate, as they foresaw this key trend a year in advance.

Summary

After reviewing last year's predictions, several patterns are quite evident:

1. The quantity of predictions is generally inversely proportional to their accuracy. The more predictions made, the more of them tend to be wrong.

2. Attempts to predict specific price points and numbers mostly ended up being off the mark.

3. Predictions related to regulations were highly reliable. Nearly all institutions and individuals accurately predicted the improvement in the regulatory environment and the U.S.'s crypto-friendly stance.

Finally, the author believes that the value of these annual institutional forecasts lies not in "telling you what to buy" but in "telling you what the industry is thinking." These predictions can be viewed as industry sentiment indicators. If used as investment guides, the results may be quite dire.

Furthermore, it's good practice to remain skeptical of any prediction with specific numbers, regardless of whether it comes from a Key Opinion Leader (KOL), institution, or industry tycoon.

This is not to suggest that we should criticize these industry elites but rather to highlight that even incorrect predictions hold value.

They tell you what the market once believed, but no one can predict the future.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more